HPM Web Site

  • HPM Web Site

Get Updates via E-mail

  • Enter your email address to automatically receive new posts to the FDA Law Blog via e-mail.

    Delivered by FeedBurner

 Subscribe in a reader

Disclaimer

  • FDA Law Blog is published for informational purposes only; it contains no legal advice whatsoever. Publication of FDA Law Blog does not create an attorney-client relationship. FDA Law Blog is the blog of Hyman, Phelps & McNamara, P.C. (“HPM”) and it is intended primarily for other attorneys and regulatory professionals. No part of FDA Law Blog --whether information, commentary, or other-- may be attributed to HPM's clients. Readers should be aware that HPM represents many companies in the food, drug, medical device, and health care industries, and therefore FDA Law Blog may occasionally report on news that relates to HPM clients. FDA Law Blog will always strive to be unbiased in its reporting. All information on FDA Law Blog should be double-checked for its accuracy and current applicability.

    Copyright 2008 Hyman, Phelps & McNamara, P.C.

« FDA Issues Comments Concerning Midodrine HCl Exclusivity Issues; Threatens to Withdraw First Subpart H Approval | Main | Notable Recent Third Circuit Decision in Appeal from FDC Act Conviction »

August 19, 2008

Traditional Diet Advocates Take a Swing at Soy Protein

The Weston A. Price Foundation has submitted a citizen petition asking FDA to revoke its regulation approving a health claim for soy protein and coronary heart disease.  According to the petition, in light of studies published since the regulation was issued in 1999, “[t]he totality of the scientific evidence on soy protein and heart disease is contradictory and inconsistent” and no longer supports the claim approved by FDA.  In addition, the petition questions whether soy protein isolates are GRAS.  The citizen petition does not acknowledge that FDA already has announced its intention to reconsider the health claim for soy protein.  That claim was approved prior to the advent of qualified health claims.  Thus, if the current supporting evidence does not meet the standard of significant scientific agreement, a qualifying statement could be added to the existing claim to more accurately reflect the strength of the supporting evidence.

In support of the requested relief, the petition cites a 2006 Science Advisory on Soy Protein, Isoflavones, and Cardiovascular Health issued by the Nutrition Committee of the American Heart Association, which concludes that “the direct cardiovascular health benefit of soy protein or isoflavone supplements is minimal at best. Soy protein or isoflavones have not been shown to improve vasomotor symptoms of menopause, and results are mixed with regard to the slowing of postmenopausal bone loss. The efficacy and safety of soy isoflavones for preventing or treating cancer of the breast, endometrium, and prostate are not established; evidence from clinical trials is meager and cautionary with regard to a possible adverse effect. For this reason, use of isoflavone supplements in food or pills is not recommended.”  However, the AGA science advisory also concludes that “soy products such as tofu, soy butter, soy nuts, or some soy burgers should be beneficial to cardiovascular and overall health because of their high content of polyunsaturated fats, fiber, vitamins, and minerals and low content of saturated fat. Using these and other soy foods to replace foods high in animal protein that contain saturated fat and cholesterol may confer benefits to cardiovascular health.”

By Ricardo Carvajal & Riëtte van Laack

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341d150c53ef00e5540ad67e8834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Traditional Diet Advocates Take a Swing at Soy Protein:

Comments

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.