HPM Web Site

  • HPM Web Site

Get Updates via E-mail

  • Enter your email address to automatically receive new posts to the FDA Law Blog via e-mail.

    Delivered by FeedBurner

 Subscribe in a reader




Disclaimer

  • FDA Law Blog is published for informational purposes only; it contains no legal advice whatsoever. Publication of FDA Law Blog does not create an attorney-client relationship. FDA Law Blog is the blog of Hyman, Phelps & McNamara, P.C. (“HPM”) and it is intended primarily for other attorneys and regulatory professionals. No part of FDA Law Blog --whether information, commentary, or other-- may be attributed to HPM's clients. Readers should be aware that HPM represents many companies in the food, drug, medical device, and health care industries, and therefore FDA Law Blog may occasionally report on news that relates to HPM clients. FDA Law Blog will always strive to be unbiased in its reporting. All information on FDA Law Blog should be double-checked for its accuracy and current applicability.

    Copyright 2011 Hyman, Phelps & McNamara, P.C.

Awards & Honors










« FDA Clarifies that 3-Year Exclusivity can be Granted for the Removal of Labeling Information | Main | District Court Rules on Jurisdiction and Non-Final Agency Action »

August 25, 2008

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341d150c53ef00e55454c6d48833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference On Tuna, Methylmercury, and Preemption, FDA’s Net Comes up Empty:

» Agency "advisory" has no preemptive effect from Administrative Law Prof Blog
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a public advisory on methylmercury in fish, suggesting that the benefits of eating fish outweighed any negative risks. The FDA Law Blog points out in On Tuna, [Read More]

Comments

The comments to this entry are closed.