- Clear that Cabinet Tour ‘24 April 18, 2024
- The Fourth Circuit Upholds CMS’ Definition of “Line-Extension Drug” and “New Formulation” April 17, 2024
- Does the Drug Shortage White Paper Fall Short? April 9, 2024
- OPQ’s 2023 Annual Report: an Upbeat Review of CDER’s Quality Efforts April 8, 2024
- FDA Tells Congress What It Wants, What it Really Really Wants (it really really really wants a zigazig-ah) April 3, 2024
- Big Molecule Watch Blog
- Bloomberg BNA Health Care Blog
- Drug and Device Law Blog
- Eye on FDA
- FDA Matters
- Harvard Law Bill of Health
- IN VIVO Blog
- Internet Drug News.com
- Lachman Consultants Blog
- Medical Devices Today
- Orange Book Blog
- The Orange Book Insights Blog
- Pharma IQ
- Pharmalot
- SCOTUS Blog
- The Volokh Conspiracy
- WLF Legal Pulse
- Advertising and Promotion (Federal Trade Commission)
- Advertising and Promotion (OPDP)
- Animal Drugs and Feeds
- Biosimilars
- Cannabis
- cGMP Compliance
- Consumer Product Safety Commission
- Controlled Substances
- Cosmetics
- COVID19
- Current Affairs
- Dietary Supplements
- Drug Development
- Drug Enforcement Administration
- Enforcement
- FDA News
- Foods
- Foods and Dietary Supplements
- Fraud and Abuse
- Government Pricing
- Hatch-Waxman
- Health Care
- Health Privacy
- Import/Export
- In Vitro Diagnostic Devices
- Jobs
- Medical Devices
- Miscellaneous
- Orphan Drugs
- OTC Drugs and Cosmetics
- Prescription Drugs and Biologics
- Product Jurisdiction and Combination Products
- Reimbursement
- Tissue Products
- Tobacco
- Uncategorized
2 = 2, Unless the 2 are in “ONE A DAY”
July 28, 2011By Ricardo Carvajal –
A federal district court dismissed with prejudice a claim that Bayer’s labeling of gummy vitamins violated the Arkansas Deceptive Trade Practices Act. Plaintiff alleged that the brand name “ONE A DAY” is misleading because the daily serving size for the vitamins is two gummies. Acknowledging that plaintiff’s claim “carries a logical appeal” and “is not silly,” the court nonetheless ruled that no reasonable consumer would be deceived when the label is considered as a whole. The label stated the dosage three times, as well as the number of servings in the container. Further, plaintiff failed to allege that he was deceived.
Search FDA Law Blog
Subscribe
Latest Tweets
Tweets by @fdalawblogAwards & Honors
- The Best
Lawyers in America
US News & World Report - Ranked in Chambers USA 2018
- Clear that Cabinet Tour ‘24 April 18, 2024
- The Fourth Circuit Upholds CMS’ Definition of “Line-Extension Drug” and “New Formulation” April 17, 2024
- Does the Drug Shortage White Paper Fall Short? April 9, 2024
- OPQ’s 2023 Annual Report: an Upbeat Review of CDER’s Quality Efforts April 8, 2024
- FDA Tells Congress What It Wants, What it Really Really Wants (it really really really wants a zigazig-ah) April 3, 2024
- Big Molecule Watch Blog
- Bloomberg BNA Health Care Blog
- Drug and Device Law Blog
- Eye on FDA
- FDA Matters
- Harvard Law Bill of Health
- IN VIVO Blog
- Internet Drug News.com
- Lachman Consultants Blog
- Medical Devices Today
- Orange Book Blog
- The Orange Book Insights Blog
- Pharma IQ
- Pharmalot
- SCOTUS Blog
- The Volokh Conspiracy
- WLF Legal Pulse
- Advertising and Promotion (Federal Trade Commission)
- Advertising and Promotion (OPDP)
- Animal Drugs and Feeds
- Biosimilars
- Cannabis
- cGMP Compliance
- Consumer Product Safety Commission
- Controlled Substances
- Cosmetics
- COVID19
- Current Affairs
- Dietary Supplements
- Drug Development
- Drug Enforcement Administration
- Enforcement
- FDA News
- Foods
- Foods and Dietary Supplements
- Fraud and Abuse
- Government Pricing
- Hatch-Waxman
- Health Care
- Health Privacy
- Import/Export
- In Vitro Diagnostic Devices
- Jobs
- Medical Devices
- Miscellaneous
- Orphan Drugs
- OTC Drugs and Cosmetics
- Prescription Drugs and Biologics
- Product Jurisdiction and Combination Products
- Reimbursement
- Tissue Products
- Tobacco
- Uncategorized